A. The board, on its own motion, may investigate evidence that appears to show that a psychologist is psychologically incompetent, guilty of unprofessional conduct or mentally or physically unable to safely engage in the practice of psychology. A health care institution shall, and any other person may, report to the board information that appears to show that a psychologist is psychologically incompetent, guilty of unprofessional conduct or mentally or physically unable to safely engage in the practice of psychology.
B. The board shall not consider a complaint against a psychologist arising out of a judicially ordered evaluation, treatment or psychoeducation of a person charged with violating any provision of title 13, chapter 14 to present a charge of unprofessional conduct unless the court ordering the evaluation has found a substantial basis to refer the complaint for consideration by the board.
C. A claim of unprofessional conduct brought on or after July 3, 2015 against a psychologist arising out of court-ordered services shall be independently reviewed by three members of the board, including a public member. Each of the three board members who are reviewing the claim shall independently provide the board's executive director a recommendation indicating whether the member believes there is merit to open an investigation. If one or more of the board members who are reviewing the claim determine that there is merit to open an investigation as a complaint, an investigation shall be opened and shall follow the complaint process pursuant to this article.
D. The board may not consider a complaint for administrative action if the complaint is filed against a person who is a licensed psychologist and who is a member of the board or a staff member of the board or who is acting as an agent of or consultant to the board if the complaint relates to the person's performance of board duties.
E. The board shall notify the psychologist about whom information has been received as to the content of the information within one hundred twenty days after receiving the information. A person who reports or provides information to the board in good faith is not subject to an action for civil damages. The board, if requested, shall not disclose the name of the person providing information unless this information is essential to proceedings conducted pursuant to this section. The board shall report a health care institution that fails to report as required by this section to the institution's licensing agency.
F. A health care institution shall inform the board if the privileges of a psychologist to practice in that institution are denied, revoked, suspended or limited because of actions by the psychologist that appear to show that that person is psychologically incompetent, guilty of unprofessional conduct or mentally or physically unable to safely engage in the practice of psychology, along with a general statement of the reasons that led the health care institution to take this action. A health care institution shall inform the board if a psychologist under investigation resigns the psychologist's privileges or if a psychologist resigns in lieu of disciplinary action by the health care institution. Notification shall include a general statement of the reasons for the resignation.
G. The board may require the licensee to undergo any combination of mental, physical or psychological competence examinations at the licensee's expense and shall conduct investigations necessary to determine the competence and conduct of the licensee.
H. The chairperson of the board shall appoint a complaint screening committee of not less than three members of the board, including a public member. The complaint screening committee is subject to open meeting requirements pursuant to title 38, chapter 3, article 3.1. Except as provided in subsection I of this section, the complaint screening committee shall review all complaints and, based on the information provided pursuant to subsection A or F of this section, may take either of the following actions:
1. Dismiss the complaint if the committee determines that there is no evidence of a violation of law or community standards of practice. Complaints dismissed by the complaint screening committee shall not be disclosed in response to a telephone inquiry or placed on the board's website.
2. Refer the complaint to the full board for further review and action.
I. If the board finds, based on the information it receives under subsection A or F of this section, that the public health, safety or welfare requires emergency action, the board may order a summary suspension of a license pending proceedings for revocation or other action. If the board issues this order, it shall serve the licensee with a written notice of complaint and formal hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10, setting forth the charges made against the licensee and the licensee's right to a formal hearing before the board or an administrative law judge within sixty days.
J. If the board finds that the information provided pursuant to subsection A or F of this section is not of sufficient seriousness to merit direct action against the licensee, it may take any of the following actions:
1. Dismiss if the board believes there is no evidence of a violation of law or community standards of practice.
2. File a letter of concern.
3. Issue a nondisciplinary order requiring the licensee to complete a prescribed number of hours of continuing education in an area or areas prescribed by the board to provide the licensee with the necessary understanding of current developments, skills, procedures or treatment.
K. If the board believes the information provided pursuant to subsection A or F of this section is or may be true, the board may request an informal interview with the psychologist. If the licensee refuses to be interviewed or if pursuant to an interview the board determines that cause may exist to revoke or suspend the license, the board shall issue a formal complaint and hold a hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10. If as a result of an informal interview or a hearing the board determines that the facts do not warrant revocation or suspension of the license, the board may take any of the following actions:
1. Dismiss if the board believes there is no evidence of a violation of law or community standards of practice.
2. File a letter of concern.
3. Issue a decree of censure.
4. Fix a period and terms of probation best adapted to protect the public health and safety and to rehabilitate or educate the psychologist. Probation may include temporary suspension for a period of not more than twelve months, restriction of the license or restitution of fees to a client or patient resulting from violations of this chapter. If a licensee fails to comply with a term of probation, the board may file a complaint and notice of hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 and take further disciplinary action.
5. Enter into an agreement with the licensee to restrict or limit the licensee's practice or activities in order to rehabilitate the psychologist, protect the public and ensure the psychologist's ability to safely engage in the practice of psychology.
6. Issue a nondisciplinary order requiring the licensee to complete a prescribed number of hours of continuing education in an area or areas prescribed by the board to provide the licensee with the necessary understanding of current developments, skills, procedures or treatment.
L. If the board finds that the information provided pursuant to subsection A or F of this section warrants suspension or revocation of a license, the board shall hold a hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10. Notice of a complaint and hearing is fully effective by mailing a true copy to the licensee's last known address of record in the board's files. Notice is complete at the time of its deposit in the mail.
M. The board may impose a civil penalty of at least $300 but not more than $3,000 for each violation of this chapter or a rule adopted under this chapter. The board shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, all monies it collects from civil penalties pursuant to this subsection in the state general fund.
N. If the board determines after a hearing that a licensee has committed an act of unprofessional conduct, is mentally or physically unable to safely engage in the practice of psychology or is psychologically incompetent, it may do any of the following in any combination and for any period of time it determines necessary:
1. Suspend or revoke the license.
2. Censure the licensee.
3. Place the licensee on probation.
O. A licensee may submit a written response to the board within thirty days after receiving a letter of concern. The response is a public document and shall be placed in the licensee's file.
P. A letter of concern is a public document and may be used in future disciplinary actions against a psychologist. A decree of censure is an official action against the psychologist's license and may include a requirement that the licensee return fees to a client or patient.
Q. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H or for a decision made pursuant to subsection C of this section, a person may appeal a final decision made pursuant to this section to the superior court pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.
R. If during the course of an investigation the board determines that a criminal violation may have occurred involving the delivery of psychological services, it shall inform the appropriate criminal justice agency.
S. If the board finds that it can take rehabilitative or disciplinary action at any time during the investigative or disciplinary process, the board may enter into a consent agreement with the psychologist to limit or restrict the psychologist's practice or to rehabilitate the psychologist in order to protect the public and ensure the psychologist's ability to safely engage in the practice of psychology. The board may also require the psychologist to successfully complete a board-approved rehabilitative, retraining or assessment program at the psychologist's expense.
T. A psychologist who conducts an independent psychological examination pursuant to section 23-1026 is not subject to a complaint of unprofessional conduct unless the complaint alleges unprofessional conduct based on an act other than a disagreement with the findings and opinions expressed by the psychologist as a result of the examination.