Arizona Statutes
§ 23-946 — Action asserting invalidity of order; limitation; venue and procedure
A.Any person in interest dissatisfied with an order of the commission may within thirty days commence an action in the superior court of the county where the property, plant or place of employment affected by the order is located against the commission as defendant to set aside, vacate or amend the order, on the ground that the order is unreasonable or unlawful, and the superior court shall have exclusive jurisdiction thereof. The commission shall be served with summons as in civil actions.
B.The answer of the commission shall be filed within twenty days after service of summons upon it. The commission shall file with the answer a certified transcript of its record in the matter, whereupon the action shall be at issue and shall be advanced for trial by the court upon application of eith
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arizona § 23-946 (Action asserting invalidity of order; limitation; venue and procedure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Evertsen v. Industrial Commission
573 P.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)
Industrial Commission v. Jordan
448 P.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1968)
Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill
349 P.2d 771 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1960)
Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise
478 P.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)
Industrial Commission v. Farm & Home Food Service, Inc.
426 P.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)
Buehler v. Retzer ex rel. Industrial Commission
260 P.3d 1085 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.
519 P.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1974)
Buehler v. RETZER EX REL. INDUS. COM'N
260 P.3d 1085 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
Greer v. Travelers Property Casualty Co.
56 P.3d 52 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)