Arizona Statutes
§ 12-686 — Inadmissible evidence
Arizona·Title 12 Arizona Revised Statutes·Ch. 6 SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS BY INDIVIDUAL PERSONS·Art. 9 Product Liability
In any product liability action, the following shall not be admissible as direct evidence of a defect:
1.Evidence of advancements or changes in the state of the art subsequent to the time the product was first sold by the defendant.
2.Evidence of any change made in the warnings, design or methods of manufacturing or testing the product or any similar product subsequent to the time the product was first sold by the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arizona § 12-686 (Inadmissible evidence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seisinger v. Siebel
203 P.3d 483 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2009)
Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.
709 P.2d 876 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1985)
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel
719 P.2d 1058 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
786 P.2d 939 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1990)
Baroldy v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
760 P.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
Hallmark v. Allied Products Corp.
646 P.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
Hohlenkamp v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
655 P.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc.
748 P.2d 1187 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Andrew Torres Amanda Torres, Husband and Wife Walter Torres Debra Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., an Ohio Corporation
901 F.2d 750 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel
719 P.2d 1070 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 12-101
Justices; number; term; election§ 12-1011
Liability for animal rescue costs§ 12-102.02
State aid to the courts fund§ 12-102.03
Local courts assistance fund§ 12-103
Seal§ 12-104
Affixing of seal§ 12-105
Days for transaction of business§ 12-106
Salary of justices§ 12-107
Publication of opinions