Arizona Statutes
§ 12-505 — Effect of statute changing limitation
A.An action barred by pre-existing law is not revived by amendment of such law enlarging the time in which such action may be commenced.
B.If an action is not barred by pre-existing law, the time fixed in an amendment of such law shall govern the limitation of the action.
C.If an amendment of pre-existing law shortens the time of limitation fixed in the pre-existing law so that an action under pre-existing law would be barred when the amendment takes effect, such action may be brought within one year from the time the new law takes effect, and not afterward.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arizona § 12-505 (Effect of statute changing limitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court
641 P.2d 1275 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1982)
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
105 P.3d 1163 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2005)
Cronin v. Sheldon
991 P.2d 231 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1999)
Landgraff v. Wagner
546 P.2d 26 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1976)
Zuck v. State
764 P.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1988)
Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc.
146 P.3d 1027 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
Flood Control Dist. v. Gaines
43 P.3d 196 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)
De Luna v. Farris
841 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Hershey v. Rich Rosen Construction Co.
817 P.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
In Re Estate of Wyttenbach
193 P.3d 814 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2008)
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
78 P.3d 1056 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2003)
Marriage of Rutherford v. Babcock
814 P.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1991)
Mayer Unified School District v. Winkleman
201 P.3d 523 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2009)
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.
128 P.3d 234 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2006)
Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.
692 P.2d 290 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1983)
Boyd v. State
540 P.3d 1228 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2023)
Acarta v. Partridge
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
Mayer Usd v. Mark Winkleman
(Arizona Supreme Court, 2009)
Stoica v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company
(D. Arizona, 2020)
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark
(Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2023)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 12-101
Justices; number; term; election§ 12-1011
Liability for animal rescue costs§ 12-102.02
State aid to the courts fund§ 12-102.03
Local courts assistance fund§ 12-103
Seal§ 12-104
Affixing of seal§ 12-105
Days for transaction of business§ 12-106
Salary of justices§ 12-107
Publication of opinions