Federal Rules of Evidence

Rule 414 — Similar Crimes in Child-Molestation Cases

Fed. R. Evid. 414
SourceFederal Rules of Evidence
Rule414
ARTICLE IVRELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS
CitationFed. R. Evid. 414

This text of Fed. R. Evid. 414 (Similar Crimes in Child-Molestation Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fed. R. Evid. 414.

Text

(a)PERMITTED USES. In a criminal case in which a defendant is accused of child molestation, the court may admit evidence that the defendant committed any other child molestation. The evi- dence may be considered on any matter to which it is relevant.
(b)DISCLOSURE TO THE DEFENDANT. If the prosecutor intends to offer this evidence, the prosecutor must disclose it to the defend- ant, including witnesses’ statements or a summary of the ex- pected testimony. The prosecutor must do so at least 15 days be- fore trial or at a later time that the court allows for good cause.
(c)EFFECT ON OTHER RULES. This rule does not limit the admis- sion or consideration of evidence under any other rule.
(d)DEFINITION OF ‘‘CHILD’’ AND ‘‘CHILD MOLESTATION.’’ In this rule and Rule 415:
(1)‘‘child’’ means a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 513
18 U.S.C. § 513

Advisory Committee Notes

(As added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320935(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2136, eff. July 9, 1995; amended Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fed. R. Evid. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/rule/fre/414.