Fed. R. Evid. 407 — Subsequent Remedial Measures

Federal Rules of Evidence

Rule 407 — Subsequent Remedial Measures

Fed. R. Evid. 407

Rule407

ARTICLE IVRELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS

CitationFed. R. Evid. 407

This text of Fed. R. Evid. 407 (Subsequent Remedial Measures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fed. R. Evid. 407.

Text

When measures are taken that would have made an earlier in-
jury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent
measures is not admissible to prove:
• negligence;
• culpable conduct;
• a defect in a product or its design; or
• a need for a warning or instruction.
But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such
as impeachment or—if disputed—proving ownership, control, or
the feasibility of precautionary measures.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

When measures are taken that would have made an earlier in-
jury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent
measures is not admissible to prove:
• negligence;
• culpable conduct;
• a defect in a product or its design; or
• a need for a warning or instruction.
But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such
as impeachment or—if disputed—proving ownership, control, or
the feasibility of precautionary measures.

Advisory Committee Notes

(As amended Apr. 11, 1997, eff. Dec. 1, 1997; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Fed. R. Evid. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/rule/fre/407.