Zygnerski v. City of New York

283 A.D.2d 574, 724 N.Y.S.2d 658, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5221
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated August 14, 2000, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint since the defendant City of New York established that it did not have prior notice of the alleged defect that caused the plaintiff to fall (see, Kempler v City of New York, 272 AD2d 584; Sewell v City of New York, 238 AD2d 331; Camacho v City of New York, 218 AD2d 725). Bracken, P. J., Friedmann, Florio, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zygnerski v. City of New York, 283 A.D.2d 574, 724 N.Y.S.2d 658, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 574 (Zygnerski v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epthimiatos v. City of New York
13 A.D.3d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)