Zydor v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zydor v. City of New York

94 A.D.2d 631, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18034

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 631 (Zydor v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zydor v. City of New York, 94 A.D.2d 631, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Katz, J.), entered on February 16, 1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to the plaintiffs, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in their favor to $250,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages [632]*632appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Katz, J.), entered on February 16, 1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to the plaintiffs, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in their favor to $250,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiffs so stipulate, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages [632]*632appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 631, 462 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zydor-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1983.