Zweig v. Zweig
This text of 174 A. 485 (Zweig v. Zweig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the wife’s appeal from an order of the court of chancery dated February 28th, 1934, denying her motion to strike out the husband’s answer in a divorce case.
A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the motion was properly denied, and the order under review is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskib, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A. 485, 116 N.J. Eq. 589, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zweig-v-zweig-nj-1934.