Zweifel v. Zweifel

Oregon Supreme Court

Zweifel v. Zweifel

273 P. 396, 128 Or. 203

DecidedJanuary 29, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 273 P. 396 (Zweifel v. Zweifel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zweifel v. Zweifel, 273 P. 396, 128 Or. 203 (Or. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BELT, J.

Defendant appeals from a decree awarding his wife a divorce, custody of two minor children and alimony for their support and maintenance. These parties were married in Union County in 1909 and have since resided there continuously. We have carefully examined the record and believe that the conclusion reached by the learned and experienced trial judge is in keeping with the facts. It would do neither party, the profession nor the public any good to recite the evidence.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELT, J.

Defendant appeals from a decree awarding his wife a divorce, custody of two minor children and alimony for their support and maintenance. These parties were married in Union County in 1909 and have since resided there continuously. We have carefully examined the record and believe that the conclusion reached by the learned and experienced trial judge is in keeping with the facts. It would do neither party, the profession nor the public any good to recite the evidence.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 P. 396, 128 Or. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zweifel-v-zweifel-or-1929.