Zweifel v. FELDERMAN

Missouri Court of Appeals

Zweifel v. FELDERMAN

344 S.W.3d 299, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2011 WL 3444120

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 9, 2011

DocketWD 72688

StatusPublished

This text of 344 S.W.3d 299 (Zweifel v. FELDERMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zweifel v. FELDERMAN, 344 S.W.3d 299, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2011 WL 3444120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded Denise Felderraan a judgment that included $10,000 in punitive damages for battery. On appeal, Felderman contends the court erred in excluding evidence that was relevant to the calculation of the punitive damages award. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a bench trial, the circuit court awarded Denise Felderraan a judgment that included $10,000 in punitive damages for battery. On appeal, Felderman contends the court erred in excluding evidence that was relevant to the calculation of the punitive damages award. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 S.W.3d 299, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2011 WL 3444120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zweifel-v-felderman-moctapp-2011.