Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Zweeres v. Pashalinsky

Zweeres v. Pashalinsky

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 4
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided January 9, 1939·No. File No. 55999·Published

Opinion

A motion to strike out is an exclusive remedy and is designed to remove improper pleadings for any of the specific reasons found in section 61 of the Rules of Practice. The essential rights of the parties should not be determined on such a motion. Wilmot vs. McPadden, 78 Conn. 276. Also, by express provision of section 100 of the Rules of Practice the objection of misjoinder of causes of action must be by demurrer.

The motions of the defendants as made are, therefore, overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zweeres v. Pashalinsky, 7 Conn. Super. Ct. 4 (Colo. Ct. App. 1939).

7 Conn. Super. Ct. 4 (Zweeres v. Pashalinsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilmot v. McPadden
61 A. 1069 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1905)