Zvolensky, R. v. PBPP
This text of Zvolensky, R. v. PBPP (Zvolensky, R. v. PBPP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RONNIE R. ZVOLENSKY, : No. 88 MM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND : PAROLE; PAROLE COUNSEL; PAROLE : AGENT BROOKS (SCI-DALLAS); : PAROLE AGENT STRICKLAND (SCI- : DALLAS); PAROLE AGENT HOLLCOME : (SCI- DALLAS); PAROLE AGENT : MICHAEL NOVACK (SCRANTON : OFFICE); PAROLE AGENT ROBERT : JONES (REGENAL [SIC] DIRECTOR); : (SCRANTON OFFICE); PAROLE AGENT : DOUG SHAFFER (SCRANTON OFFICE); : PAROLE AGENT CHRIS TAYLOR : (SCRANTON OFFICE), : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zvolensky, R. v. PBPP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zvolensky-r-v-pbpp-pa-2015.