Zuza v. Dickinson
This text of 18 A.D.2d 1088 (Zuza v. Dickinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services and medical expenses, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated [1089]*1089December 10, 1962, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion the record presents issues which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment (cf. Simon v. Appelbaum, 9 A D 2d 695; Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381). Ug'hetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A.D.2d 1088, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuza-v-dickinson-nyappdiv-1963.