Zuver v. Industrial Commission

252 P. 361, 80 Colo. 429, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 278
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 10, 1927·No. No. 11,702.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*430 Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought suit to review the action of the Industrial Commission which denied him compensation. His case was dismissed and he brings error. The judgment was right.

Zuver’s claim was disallowed by the referee, and, on motion for review, the referee sent the whole case to the commission which also denied compensation. No petition for review was then made to the commission. Under these facts no action lies in the district court to review the commission’s award. Carlson v. Industrial Com., 79 Colo. 124, 244 Pac. 68. See also Brady v. Industrial Com., 80 Colo. 62, 249 Pac. 6.

Plaintiff in error argues that his attorney withdrew after the commission’s award, and that he did not know that the application for review was necessary, but we cannot ignore the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Allen not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zuver v. Industrial Commission, 252 P. 361, 80 Colo. 429, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 278 (Colo. 1927).

252 P. 361 (Zuver v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.
140 P.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1943)
Industrial Commission v. Martinez
77 P.2d 646 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1938)
French v. Industrial Commission
274 P. 742 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)