Zurruz Realty Corp. v. Calvert Insurance

228 A.D.2d 267, 643 N.Y.2d 582, 643 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6728
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Summary judgment should have been denied. Plaintiffs assertions as to defendant insurer’s conduct, that it issued a post-[268] cancellation endorsement correcting the error which allegedly triggered the notice of cancellation and accepted and retained the full premium until 45 days after the loss in question occurred and 7 months after the purported cancellation took effect, raise triable issues of fact as to when the cancellation of the insurance policy was properly effected, if ever. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zurruz Realty Corp. v. Calvert Insurance, 228 A.D.2d 267, 643 N.Y.2d 582, 643 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 267 (Zurruz Realty Corp. v. Calvert Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tobias v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
78 A.D.3d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)