Zurovetz v. Argenbright

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: April 28, 2022
• Docket: 21-40653
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-40653 Document: 00516298687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED April 28, 2022 No. 21-40653 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

Todd Zurovetz,

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Corrections Officer Christopher Argenbright; Correction Officer Daron C. Lofton; Corrections Officer John Doe One; John Doe Two,

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:19-CV-481

Before Southwick, Graves, and Costa, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Todd Zurovetz, Texas prisoner # 1931368, seeks to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from a judgment entered after a jury verdict for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. Zurovetz contends

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-40653 Document: 00516298687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2022

No. 21-40653

only that certain evidence about his alleged injuries was withheld or not adduced. His conclusional assertion does not identify any nonfrivolous basis for challenging the jury’s verdict. Because he thus identifies no nonfrivolous issue for appeal, his IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All of Zurovetz’s outstanding motions are DENIED. This court’s dismissal of the appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See § 1915(g); Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015); McGarrah v. Alford, 783 F.3d 584, 584-85 (5th Cir. 2015). Zurovetz has a prior strike. See Zurovetz v. Hurt, No. 5:19-CV-136 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 26, 2019). Accordingly, Zurovetz is WARNED that, if he accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).