Zurn v. Zurn
This text of 651 A.2d 529 (Zurn v. Zurn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the Judgment of the Superior Court, No. 1192 Pittsburgh 1993, dated July 19, 1994 is hereby REVERSED and REMANDED to that Court for consideration of the merits of the Appeal. As the trial court’s designation of himself as “master” is without effect to transform the trial court into a master within the meaning of the Rules of Civil Procedure and as the trial court entertained and ruled on the post-trial motions, the appeal is not untimely. Cf. In re: Appeal of the Borough of Churchill, 525 Pa. 80, 575 A.2d 550 (1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 A.2d 529, 539 Pa. 200, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurn-v-zurn-pa-1994.