Zurline v. Porter
94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 545, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 400
This text of 94 S.E. 813 (Zurline v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zurline v. Porter, 94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 545, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
1. The excerpts from the charge of the court, when read in connection with the entire charge and as adapted to the pleadings and contentions of the parties, are not erroneous.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and it was not error, for any of the reasons assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 545, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurline-v-porter-gactapp-1918.