Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.

258 A.D. 784, 15 N.Y.S.2d 587

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 784 (Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp., 258 A.D. 784, 15 N.Y.S.2d 587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. In affirming the judgment, however, we do not determine whether the note on which the action was instituted, or any part of it, was held by Joseph Zurla in trust for his sisters and brother. We hold only that the defendant-appellant has failed to establish any • defense to the note.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. In affirming the judgment, however, we do not determine whether the note on which the action was instituted, or any part of it, was held by Joseph Zurla in trust for his sisters and brother. We hold only that the defendant-appellant has failed to establish any • defense to the note.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 784, 15 N.Y.S.2d 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurla-v-jay-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1939.