Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.

258 A.D. 784, 15 N.Y.S.2d 587

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. In affirming the judgment, however, we do not determine whether the note on which the action was instituted, or any part of it, was held by Joseph Zurla in trust for his sisters and brother. We hold only that the defendant-appellant has failed to establish any • defense to the note.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. In affirming the judgment, however, we do not determine whether the note on which the action was instituted, or any part of it, was held by Joseph Zurla in trust for his sisters and brother. We hold only that the defendant-appellant has failed to establish any • defense to the note.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp., 258 A.D. 784, 15 N.Y.S.2d 587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 784 (Zurla v. Jay Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.