Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Lawson
This text of 200 S.E. 559 (Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that the bill of exceptions fails to specify plainly the alleged errors complained of, is denied.
2. The controlling question in this case is whether the claimant, at the [266]*266time of liis injury, was an employee of tlie Wofford Oil Company or an independent contractor. The evidence adduced on the hearing authorized the finding of the director and of the Industrial Board that the claimant was an independent contractor, and therefore was not entitled to compensation. It follows that the judge of the superior court erred in sustaining the claimant’s appeal and in setting' aside the award of the Industrial Board.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 S.E. 559, 59 Ga. App. 265, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-general-accident-liability-insurance-v-lawson-gactapp-1938.