Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King

185 A. 365, 14 N.J. Misc. 373, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 335
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 4, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 185 A. 365 (Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King, 185 A. 365, 14 N.J. Misc. 373, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 1936).

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

Defendants, residents of Hudson county, moved to change the venue from Essex county where the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, maintains its principal office in this state, to Hudson county where not only the defendants reside but the cause of action arose. The motion should be granted. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. North Jersey [374]*374and P. M. Ice Co., 65 N. J. L. 524; 47 Atl. Rep. 471; Starke Advertising Agency v. Adams, 74 N. J. L. 143; 64 Atl. Rep. 990.

The attorneys for the plaintiff Sled no brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starke Advertising Agency v. Adams
64 A. 990 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A. 365, 14 N.J. Misc. 373, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-general-accident-liability-insurance-v-king-nj-1936.