Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King

185 A. 365, 14 N.J. Misc. 373, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 335
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 4, 1936·Published

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

Defendants, residents of Hudson county, moved to change the venue from Essex county where the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, maintains its principal office in this state, to Hudson county where not only the defendants reside but the cause of action arose. The motion should be granted. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. North Jersey [374]*374and P. M. Ice Co., 65 N. J. L. 524; 47 Atl. Rep. 471; Starke Advertising Agency v. Adams, 74 N. J. L. 143; 64 Atl. Rep. 990.

The attorneys for the plaintiff Sled no brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King, 185 A. 365, 14 N.J. Misc. 373, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 1936).

185 A. 365 (Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starke Advertising Agency v. Adams
64 A. 990 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906)