Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
This text of 254 A.D. 839 (Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Bethlehem Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(dissenting in part). I dissent in part and vote to reverse the order and judgment ' appealed from in so far as they limit the plaintiff’s recovery, and grant judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint, for the reasons stated by Judge Hand in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, in Anglo-Continentale Treuhand A. G., v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. (81 F. [2d] 11; certiorari denied Henwood, Trustee v. Anglo-Continentale Treuhand A. G., 298 U. S. 655). In addition, in our opinion, the prior judgments are res adjudícala as to those coupons now sued on which were detached from the forty bonds involved in the prior suits.
Callahan, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 839, 6 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-general-accident-liability-insurance-v-bethlehem-steel-co-nyappdiv-1938.