Zurich American v. Watts Indus Inc
This text of Zurich American v. Watts Indus Inc (Zurich American v. Watts Indus Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
August 9, 2005
Before
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ] Appeals from the United Petitioner-Appellee, ] States District Court for Cross-Appellant, ] the Northern District of ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Nos. 03-3851 and 03-3853 v. ] ] No. 01 C 7673 WATTS INDUSTRIES, INC., ] Respondent-Appellant, ] Elaine E. Bucklo, Judge. Cross-Appellee, ] ] and ] ] JAMES JONES COMPANY, ] Respondent, ] Cross-Appellee. ]
Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT OPINION, filed on August 5, 2005, by counsel for respondent Watts Industries, Inc.,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the opinion issued in this appeal on August 2, 2005, is AMENDED in the following way: the last sentence in footnote 8 is changed to “At this point, Zurich has paid more than $23 million in defense costs.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zurich American v. Watts Indus Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-american-v-watts-indus-inc-ca7-2005.