Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co.

128 A.D.2d 517, 512 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44211

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 517 (Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co., 128 A.D.2d 517, 512 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid premiums for workers’ compensation and business automobile insurance policies, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.), dated December 11, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal amount of $21,735.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the credible evidence persuades us that a finding different from that of the trial court is unwarranted (see, Matter of Fasano v State of New York, 113 AD2d 885, 887-888; Lucenti v Cayuga Apts., 59 AD2d 438, 442).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover unpaid premiums for workers’ compensation and business automobile insurance policies, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.), dated December 11, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal amount of $21,735.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the credible evidence persuades us that a finding different from that of the trial court is unwarranted (see, Matter of Fasano v State of New York, 113 AD2d 885, 887-888; Lucenti v Cayuga Apts., 59 AD2d 438, 442).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 517, 512 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-american-insurance-v-selecto-products-co-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack