Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co.

128 A.D.2d 517, 512 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44211

Opinion

In an action to recover unpaid premiums for workers’ compensation and business automobile insurance policies, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.), dated December 11, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal amount of $21,735.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A review of the credible evidence persuades us that a finding different from that of the trial court is unwarranted (see, Matter of Fasano v State of New York, 113 AD2d 885, 887-888; Lucenti v Cayuga Apts., 59 AD2d 438, 442).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co., 128 A.D.2d 517, 512 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

128 A.D.2d 517 (Zurich American Insurance v. Selecto Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucenti v. Cayuga Apartments, Inc.
59 A.D.2d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Fasano v. State
113 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)