Zurich American Insurance Company v. Arthur Hill
This text of Zurich American Insurance Company v. Arthur Hill (Zurich American Insurance Company v. Arthur Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
On December 17, 2003, appellant, Zurich American Insurance Company, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (1) based on an agreement resolving the underlying dispute. The motion includes a certificate of service that counsel for appellee was served a copy of the motion by first class mail on December 3, 2003. No response to the motion has been received.
Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, appellant's Motion to Dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Rule 42.1(a).
All costs are assessed to appellant. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Phil Johnson
Chief Justice
1. A rule of appellate procedure will hereafter be referred to as "Rule ____."
P="BR2">
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Arthur Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurich-american-insurance-company-v-arthur-hill-texapp-2004.