Zurfluh v. Hartman
178 P. 454, 105 Wash. 700, 1919 Wash. LEXIS 593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zurfluh v. Hartman. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 Wash. 452 →
Opinion
On Rehearing.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 103 Wash. 452, 174 Pac. 963, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zurfluh v. Hartman, 178 P. 454, 105 Wash. 700, 1919 Wash. LEXIS 593 (Wash. 1919).
178 P. 454 (Zurfluh v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zurfluh v. Hartman
174 P. 963 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)