Zurfluh v. Hartman
178 P. 454, 105 Wash. 700, 1919 Wash. LEXIS 593
This text of 178 P. 454 (Zurfluh v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zurfluh v. Hartman, 178 P. 454, 105 Wash. 700, 1919 Wash. LEXIS 593 (Wash. 1919).
Opinion
On Rehearing.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 103 Wash. 452, 174 Pac. 963, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Zurfluh v. Hartman
174 P. 963 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 P. 454, 105 Wash. 700, 1919 Wash. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zurfluh-v-hartman-wash-1919.