Zuraf v. Town of Elma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zuraf v. Town of Elma

166 A.D.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D.2d 908 (Zuraf v. Town of Elma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zuraf v. Town of Elma, 166 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions dismissing the complaint against them. The uncontroverted evidence submitted by defendants shows that they had no notice of any defective or dangerous condition on the premises upon which plaintiff was injured. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions dismissing the complaint against them. The uncontroverted evidence submitted by defendants shows that they had no notice of any defective or dangerous condition on the premises upon which plaintiff was injured. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuraf-v-town-of-elma-nyappdiv-1990.