Zupaniotis v. Commissioner of Transp., No. Cv01 0185037 S (Mar. 18, 2003)

Connecticut Superior Court

Zupaniotis v. Commissioner of Transp., No. Cv01 0185037 S (Mar. 18, 2003)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3631

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 18, 2003

DocketNo. CV01 0185037 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3631 (Zupaniotis v. Commissioner of Transp., No. Cv01 0185037 S (Mar. 18, 2003)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zupaniotis v. Commissioner of Transp., No. Cv01 0185037 S (Mar. 18, 2003), 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3631 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER The defendant's objection to the plaintiffs' bill of costs as to the $800 fee for testimony of their appraiser is sustained. The parties agreed to an appraisal fee of $500. A fee for testifying is not properly recoverable in the plaintiffs' bill of costs, as requested by the plaintiffs, based upon C.G.S. § 52-257a upon which the plaintiffs rely. The plaintiffs have filed no written response to the defendant's objection, nor is there any evidence before the court from which it could determine what constitutes a reasonable amount of appraiser fees as an issue of fact. C.G.S. § 13a-76.

So Ordered. D'Andrea, J.T.R.

CT Page 3632

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER The defendant's objection to the plaintiffs' bill of costs as to the $800 fee for testimony of their appraiser is sustained. The parties agreed to an appraisal fee of $500. A fee for testifying is not properly recoverable in the plaintiffs' bill of costs, as requested by the plaintiffs, based upon C.G.S. § 52-257a upon which the plaintiffs rely. The plaintiffs have filed no written response to the defendant's objection, nor is there any evidence before the court from which it could determine what constitutes a reasonable amount of appraiser fees as an issue of fact. C.G.S. § 13a-76.

So Ordered. D'Andrea, J.T.R.

CT Page 3632

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 3631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zupaniotis-v-commissioner-of-transp-no-cv01-0185037-s-mar-18-2003-connsuperct-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack