Zuniga v. State
This text of 490 S.W.2d 577 (Zuniga v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of carrying on and about his person a pistol in premises covered by license to sell beer known as Ferns Bar, The jury assessed his punishment at three (3) years.
On May 30, 1970, Ferns Bar in San Angelo was duly licensed to sell beer. On that day appellant was in the bar drinking beer. Later appellant walked over to Joe Guerra, another customer, and struck him on the head, after which they fought. Police officers were notified of the disturbance, and arrived as appellant was going out the back door. Upon being arrested for being drunk in a public place, the officers took from appellant’s possession a small .22 pistol.
The court gave a correct charge. There was included a charge on circumstantial evidence.
Appellant’s brief points out three specific grounds of error, but cites no authorities, and is not in compliance with Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 520.
However, we have examined the record and conclude there are no questions raised of constitutional dimensions nor are there any which require discussion under Art. 40.09, Sec. 13, V.A.C.C.P.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 S.W.2d 577, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuniga-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.