Zumwalt v. Schwartz

California Court of Appeal

Zumwalt v. Schwartz

108 Cal. App. 115

California Court of Appeal·Decided September 5, 1930·No. Civ. No. 7242·Published

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that in filing briefs the parties must print such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.

We are of the opinion that appellants’ brief and supplement thereto sufficiently shows the error relied upon by them.

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that in filing briefs the parties must print such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.

We are of the opinion that appellants’ brief and supplement thereto sufficiently shows the error relied upon by them.

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Zumwalt v. Schwartz, 108 Cal. App. 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

108 Cal. App. 115 (Zumwalt v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.