Zumwalt v. Schwartz

California Court of Appeal

Zumwalt v. Schwartz

290 P. 927, 108 Cal. App. 115, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 153

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 5, 1930

DocketDocket No. 7242.

StatusPublished

This text of 290 P. 927 (Zumwalt v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zumwalt v. Schwartz, 290 P. 927, 108 Cal. App. 115, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that in filing briefs the parties must print such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.

[1] We are of the opinion that appellants' brief and supplement thereto sufficiently shows the error relied upon by them.

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred. *Page 116

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that in filing briefs the parties must print such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.

[1] We are of the opinion that appellants' brief and supplement thereto sufficiently shows the error relied upon by them.

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred. *Page 116

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 P. 927, 108 Cal. App. 115, 1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zumwalt-v-schwartz-calctapp-1930.