Zumbrunnen v. Turner
This text of 497 P.2d 34 (Zumbrunnen v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Affirmed.
The day before defendant’s trial setting, and represented by counsel, he pleaded guilty to burglary upon dismissal of two similar charges. He pursued this petition, after his time for appeal from the conviction had expired. He claimed 1) his plea was involuntary and unintelligent, and that 2) his counsel, who assisted him at his request, was incompetent. Both points could have been urged on a regular appeal. This court repeatedly has said the writ cannot be used as a substitute for such appeal. Besides, it appears that neither point is well taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 P.2d 34, 27 Utah 2d 428, 1972 Utah LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zumbrunnen-v-turner-utah-1972.