Zullo v. Zullo

317 So. 2d 453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1975
Docket74-1584
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 317 So. 2d 453 (Zullo v. Zullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zullo v. Zullo, 317 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

317 So.2d 453 (1975)

Gertrude S. ZULLO, Appellant,
v.
Joseph ZULLO, Appellee.

No. 74-1584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 1975.
Rehearing Denied September 15, 1975.

Albert George Siegel, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Abramson, Scremin, Mendigutia & Libman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Gertrude S. Zullo, the former wife of Joseph Zullo, from a final judgment which found that the plaintiff, Joseph Zullo, was entitled to certain monies which represented one-half the payments on a mortgage in their joint names. We have not been furnished with a record of the evidence before the trial judge and appellant states that she accepts the findings of fact contained in the judgment. *454 One of these findings of fact together with the conclusions of law is as follows:

"7. In this action Mr. Zullo alleges that he is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the purchase money mortgage and note, and the Court concludes under the facts in this case, he is.
"The `Release' and Quit-Claim Deed were executed by Mr. Zullo as a property settlement agreement in contemplation of a divorce to be obtained at that time-in 1963; the divorce, however, was not obtained at that time and the parties reconciled. The `Release' and Quit-Claim Deed, therefore, are invalid and Mr. Zullo remained a joint owner of the property and, therefore, is entitled to a one-half interest in the note and mortgage."

We hold that the court's conclusion of law upon the facts stated is supported by the law stated in Weeks v. Weeks, 1940, 143 Fla. 686, 197 So. 393, 395.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sorrentino v. River Run Condominium Ass'n
925 So. 2d 1060 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cox v. Cox
659 So. 2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Thomas v. Thomas
571 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Delgado v. Cotta De Lopez
546 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Weston v. Weston
483 So. 2d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 So. 2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zullo-v-zullo-fladistctapp-1975.