Zug v. Searight
24 A. 746, 150 Pa. 506, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1350
Opinion
The only question in this case has been so intelligently discussed by the learned judge who heard it below in his opinion on the exceptions to the auditor’s report, that we affirm the decree for the reasons there given by him.
The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zug v. Searight, 24 A. 746, 150 Pa. 506, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1350 (Pa. 1892).
24 A. 746 (Zug v. Searight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal Land Bank v. Heiser
36 Pa. D. & C.3d 115 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1985)
Scavo v. High Mount Lodge & Cottages, Inc.
54 Pa. D. & C.2d 475 (Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Bucks County Bank & Trust Co. v. Frey
36 Pa. D. & C.2d 382 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1965)
In re Torchia
185 F. 576 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1911)
Sherrard's Executors v. Johnston
44 A. 252 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)