Zuendt v. A. Eisenstein, Inc.

55 A.2d 43, 140 N.J. Eq. 472, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 515
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 25, 1947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Kays, and reported at 139 N. J. Eq. 476.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Waci-ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zuendt v. A. Eisenstein, Inc., 55 A.2d 43, 140 N.J. Eq. 472, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 515 (N.J. 1947).

55 A.2d 43 (Zuendt v. A. Eisenstein, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herman v. Brickman
73 A.2d 730 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)