Zuckerman & Vernon Corp. v. Motchkavitz

370 So. 2d 1170, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14000
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1979
DocketNo. 78-1973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 370 So. 2d 1170 (Zuckerman & Vernon Corp. v. Motchkavitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zuckerman & Vernon Corp. v. Motchkavitz, 370 So. 2d 1170, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Before us is a motion to dismiss an appeal commenced by one co-defendant who seeks review of a final judgment exonerating another co-defendant from liability. On the authority of Christian et al. v. Popovich et al., 363 So.2d 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) and Sol Walker & Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co., 362 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) the motion to dismiss is denied.

In so ruling we hold that the right of one co-defendant to appeal a judgment which exonerates another co-defendant is inherently implied in Florida’s Contribution Act, Section 768.31, Florida Statutes (1977).

LETTS, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pensacola Interstate Fair, Inc. v. Popovich
389 So. 2d 1179 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 So. 2d 1170, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuckerman-vernon-corp-v-motchkavitz-fladistctapp-1979.