Zuckerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 8, 2021·No. 18-1800·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Cnited States Court of Federal Claiung

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1800V Filed: January 12, 2021

* CK Ck Ck Ck Kk Ok Ok OK OK OK OKO MITCHELL ZUCKERMAN, ** UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Chronic Inflammatory v. * Demyelinating Polyneuropathy * (“CIDP”); Influenza (“Flu”) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ** Vaccine AND HUMAN SERVICES, *s * Respondent. *

* CK Ck Ck Ck Kk Ok Ok OK OK OK OKO

Bridget McCullough, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. James Lopez, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION! Roth, Special Master:

On November 21, 2018, Mitchell Zuckerman (“Mr. Zuckerman” or “petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petitioner alleges that he developed chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 7, 2016. Stipulation, filed Jan. 12, 2021, at {| 1-4. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged CIDP or any other injury or condition. Stipulation at { 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On January 12, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

| Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. /d.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $195,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Mitchell Zuckerman. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) MITCHELL ZUCKERMAN ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-1800V v. ) Special Master Roth ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1, Mitchell Zuckerman, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on September 7, 2016.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from a non-Table injury, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), after receiving a flu vaccine, and that he experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged CIDP or any other injury or condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $195,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zuckerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Zuckerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Zuckerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a