Zuckerman v. Greason

Supreme Court

Zuckerman v. Greason

386 U.S. 15, 87 S. Ct. 847, 17 L. Ed. 2d 696, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2273

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 71·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.

Zuckerman v. Greason, 386 U.S. 15, 87 S. Ct. 847, 17 L. Ed. 2d 696, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2273 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 15 (Zuckerman v. Greason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related