Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture

795 So. 2d 231, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2001 WL 1130842
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2838·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claire Zuckerman appeals an Immediate Final Order from the Department of Agriculture informing her that her citrus trees might be destroyed if they were infected with citrus canker or were located within 1900 feet of a canker-infested tree. We affirm based upon Markus v. Fla. Dep’t. of Agriculture & Consumer Svcs., 785 So.2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to bring an action for inverse condemnation, or to seek such oth[232]*232er relief as is appropriate. Markus, 785 So.2d at 596.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture, 795 So. 2d 231, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2001 WL 1130842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

795 So. 2d 231 (Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Markus v. FLA. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
785 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)