Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture
795 So. 2d 231, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2001 WL 1130842
Opinion
Claire Zuckerman appeals an Immediate Final Order from the Department of Agriculture informing her that her citrus trees might be destroyed if they were infected with citrus canker or were located within 1900 feet of a canker-infested tree. We affirm based upon Markus v. Fla. Dep’t. of Agriculture & Consumer Svcs., 785 So.2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to bring an action for inverse condemnation, or to seek such oth[232] er relief as is appropriate. Markus, 785 So.2d at 596.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture, 795 So. 2d 231, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13444, 2001 WL 1130842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
795 So. 2d 231 (Zuckerman v. Florida Department of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Markus v. FLA. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
785 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)