Zuckerman v. Citibank, N.A.
580 So. 2d 886, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5928
Opinion
Affirmed. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester, 400 So.2d 804, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So.2d 818, 819 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So.2d 395 (Fla.1973); Arrow Beef Corp. v. Dutkin, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Co., 145 So.2d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), cert. denied, 155 So.2d 552 (Fla.1963).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zuckerman v. Citibank, N.A., 580 So. 2d 886, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5928 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
580 So. 2d 886 (Zuckerman v. Citibank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester
400 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P PAINT AND BODY SHOP, INC.
277 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Co.
145 So. 2d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Arrow Beef Corp. v. Dutkin
183 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)