Zucker v. Siegel
This text of 54 A.D.2d 979 (Zucker v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff Harry Zucker appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 11, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of defendant Siegel and against him. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court’s determination that appellant did not rely upon the warranty was amply supported by the evidence. Appellant’s claim was properly rejected (cf. Friedman v Medtronic, Inc., 42 AD2d 185). Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 A.D.2d 979, 388 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zucker-v-siegel-nyappdiv-1976.