Zucker v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zucker v. Siegel

54 A.D.2d 979, 388 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff Harry Zucker appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 11, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of defendant Siegel and against him. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court’s determination that appellant did not rely upon the warranty was amply supported by the evidence. Appellant’s claim was properly rejected (cf. Friedman v Medtronic, Inc., 42 AD2d 185). Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff Harry Zucker appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 11, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of defendant Siegel and against him. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court’s determination that appellant did not rely upon the warranty was amply supported by the evidence. Appellant’s claim was properly rejected (cf. Friedman v Medtronic, Inc., 42 AD2d 185). Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Zucker v. Siegel, 54 A.D.2d 979, 388 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 979 (Zucker v. Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related