Zucchi v. Thomas

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Zucchi v. Thomas

2 R.I. Dec. 30

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedNovember 4, 1925

DocketNo. 63169

StatusPublished

This text of 2 R.I. Dec. 30 (Zucchi v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zucchi v. Thomas, 2 R.I. Dec. 30 (R.I. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion, for new trial filed by plaintiff after verdict of a jury for defendant.

Action arose over a promissory note sold by holder to plaintiff.

Note was payable on demand and testimony was introduced that while note was in the hands of original payee same was dishonoured, and that the note at the time of its purchase by plaintiff was so long unpaid that purchaser took same subject to all equities existing between the maker and payee.

The court allowed testimony to be introduced as to such equities and can hot say the jury was not justified in its verdict.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion, for new trial filed by plaintiff after verdict of a jury for defendant.

Action arose over a promissory note sold by holder to plaintiff.

Note was payable on demand and testimony was introduced that while note was in the hands of original payee same was dishonoured, and that the note at the time of its purchase by plaintiff was so long unpaid that purchaser took same subject to all equities existing between the maker and payee.

The court allowed testimony to be introduced as to such equities and can hot say the jury was not justified in its verdict.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 R.I. Dec. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zucchi-v-thomas-risuperct-1925.