Zuaro

546 F.2d 431, 211 Ct. Cl. 342, 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 189
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedOctober 6, 1976
DocketNo. 437-74
StatusPublished

This text of 546 F.2d 431 (Zuaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zuaro, 546 F.2d 431, 211 Ct. Cl. 342, 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 189 (cc 1976).

Opinion

Uourt of Claims jurisdiction; transfer of case to district, court. — On October 6, 1976 the court entered the following order:.

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges. . . ■

- “This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion, filed May 19,1976, to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and defendant’s opposition thereto. The case has been considered without oral argument.

“Without passing upon the issues which will be before the District Court, the court concludes that it is in the interest of justice to grant plaintiff’s motion and to transfer the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1506 to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia so that that court can decide for itself whether plaintiff has presented a claim within the jurisdiction of the .district courts.

[343]*343“Tbiis transfer is made on the assumption that plaintiff will seek, as he says he will, to substitute the Maritime Admin-. istrator for the United States as party defendant. The Clerk of this court will forward the record in this court to the Clerk of that court.

“it IS SO ORDERED.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1506
28 U.S.C. § 1506

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 F.2d 431, 211 Ct. Cl. 342, 1976 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zuaro-cc-1976.