Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard
This text of Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard (Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard
Appellate case number: 01-17-00918-CV
Trial court case number: CV-0077741
Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County
Appellants, Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam, have filed a motion to reopen this appeal, which we construe as a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.5. Appellants’ motion is untimely. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.5. In addition, this Court’s plenary power expired on December 20, 2018, which is 30 days after it denied appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration. TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b). After its plenary power expires, this Court cannot vacate or modify its judgment except as provided in Rule 19.3, which does not apply here. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3.
Accordingly, we dismiss appellants’ motion for lack of jurisdiction.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: January 9, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zsolt-petko-and-zsuzsanna-adam-v-carelton-courtyard-texapp-2020.