Zotto v. Merkel Bros.

229 A.D. 793
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 229 A.D. 793 (Zotto v. Merkel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zotto v. Merkel Bros., 229 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Plaintiff was not acting as the agent of his wife, the intestate, when he purchased the pork and there is consequently no privity of contract between the intestate and defendant. (Chysky v. Drake Brothers Co., 235 N. Y. 468; Redmond v. Borden’s Farm Products Co., Inc., 245 id. 512; Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co., 248 id. 73; Smith v. Hanson, 228 App. Div. 634.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenberg v. Lorenz
12 Misc. 2d 883 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Parish v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
13 Misc. 2d 33 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1958)
Greenberg v. Lorenz
14 Misc. 2d 279 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Welch v. Schiebelhuth
11 Misc. 2d 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Conklin v. Hotel Waldorf Astoria Corp.
5 Misc. 2d 496 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Dumbrow v. Ettinger
44 F. Supp. 763 (E.D. New York, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zotto-v-merkel-bros-nyappdiv-1930.