Zortman v. Pennsylvania
181 L. Ed. 2d 730, 132 S. Ct. 1073, 565 U.S. 1108, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 316, 80 U.S.L.W. 3395, 2012 WL 33279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zortman v. Pennsylvania. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 U.S. 1236 →
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [731]*731denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 30, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Same case below, 611 Pa. 22, 23 A.3d 519.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zortman v. Pennsylvania, 181 L. Ed. 2d 730, 132 S. Ct. 1073, 565 U.S. 1108, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 316, 80 U.S.L.W. 3395, 2012 WL 33279 (U.S. 2012).
181 L. Ed. 2d 730 (Zortman v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Zortman
23 A.3d 519 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)