Zorn v. State

321 S.W.2d 90, 167 Tex. Crim. 502, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1881
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 1959·No. 30479·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for keeping and exhibiting a gaming table and bank for the purpose of gaming; the punishment, two years.

The disposition hereof makes a summary of the facts unnecessary.

Formal Bill of Exception No. 3 shows that the trial court permitted the state to introduce the affidavit, search warrant and return made thereon into evidence before the jury over appellant’s objection that they were hearsay. Such instruments were hearsay and prejudicial to the rights of the appellant; should not have been admitted in evidence before the jury, and calls for a reversal. 37-B Tex.Jur. 489, Sec. 36; 3 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d 106, Sec. 1335; Hall v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 320, 125 S.W.2d 293; Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169; Hebert v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 255 S.W.2d 512.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zorn v. State, 321 S.W.2d 90, 167 Tex. Crim. 502, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1881 (Tex. 1959).

321 S.W.2d 90 (Zorn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larry Dale Baxter v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001
Baxter v. State
66 S.W.3d 494 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Pratt v. State
748 S.W.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Cherry v. State
479 S.W.2d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Albitez v. State
461 S.W.2d 609 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Mims v. State
378 S.W.2d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Tucker v. State
339 S.W.2d 64 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Zorn v. State
335 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)