Zorn v. Hannah & Co.

25 S.E. 829, 99 Ga. 634
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 2, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The declaration, with or without the amendment, set forth a cause of action, and it was therefore error to dismiss the action on general demurrer. Judgment reversed.

Defendants demurred upon the ground, that plaintiff’s cause of action, if any exists, is not sufficiently, plainly and distinctly set forth; and that the allegations are too general and not distinctly alleged. The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff excepted. R. V. Hardeman & Son and Worrill & Lester, for plaintiff. M. H. Stmdioich and J. Y. Allen, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zorn v. Hannah & Co., 25 S.E. 829, 99 Ga. 634 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 829 (Zorn v. Hannah & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roper v. State
31 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Netzow Manufacturing Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
66 S.E. 399 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Livingston v. Anderson & Son
58 S.E. 505 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Zorn v. Hannah & Co.
31 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)