Zoning Board of Appeals v. Bemis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Zoning Board of Appeals v. Bemis

477 A.2d 170, 2 Conn. App. 278

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedApril 12, 1984

Docket(2377)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 477 A.2d 170 (Zoning Board of Appeals v. Bemis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zoning Board of Appeals v. Bemis, 477 A.2d 170, 2 Conn. App. 278 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At oral argument, counsel for the plaintiffs, who filed the appeal 1 in this case, candidly admitted to the court that the legal claims they advance here were never presented to the trial court; and that the trial court decided the case on the basis of the claims, theories and evidence presented to it by them. Furthermore, our examination of the record indicates that the claims presented to us in the plaintiffs’ brief and argument were totally unrelated to those presented in their preliminary statement of issues on appeal under Practice Book § 3012 (a). Under these circumstances we decline to consider the plaintiffs’ claims.

There is no error.

1

This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At oral argument, counsel for the plaintiffs, who filed the appeal 1 in this case, candidly admitted to the court that the legal claims they advance here were never presented to the trial court; and that the trial court decided the case on the basis of the claims, theories and evidence presented to it by them. Furthermore, our examination of the record indicates that the claims presented to us in the plaintiffs’ brief and argument were totally unrelated to those presented in their preliminary statement of issues on appeal under Practice Book § 3012 (a). Under these circumstances we decline to consider the plaintiffs’ claims.

There is no error.

1

This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 A.2d 170, 2 Conn. App. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zoning-board-of-appeals-v-bemis-connappct-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack