Zone Vs. Fremont St. Experience Llc

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 2020
Docket80600
StatusPublished

This text of Zone Vs. Fremont St. Experience Llc (Zone Vs. Fremont St. Experience Llc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zone Vs. Fremont St. Experience Llc, (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RADE Q. ZONE, No. 80600 Appellant, VS. FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE LLC,

FILED MAR 0 6 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK g SfREME COURT BY DEPUreCrEj-..." RK 6.'

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Adriana Escobar, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal, docketing statement, and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It does not appear that the district court has entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). The challenged order grants summary judgment only in favor of respondent Fremont Street Experience, LLC. And, although a minute order issued on February 20, 2020, appears to resolve appellant's claims against respondent City of Las Vegas, it appears that the district court has not entered a final written judgment disposing of the claims. See State, Div. of Child & Family Serv. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451-54, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243-45 (2004) ("[D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."); Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (stating that the district court's minute order is ineffective and cannot be appealed). As no other statute or court rule allows an appeal from the challenged order, see Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev, 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule), this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

PP4jtaLja Parraguirre 64° , J.

-,-1 J. Hardesty

Cadish

cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Rade Q. Zone Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLPILas Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'Once the district court has entered a final, written order resolving all of the claims and issues below, any aggrieved party may appeal. SUPRENE COURT OF NEVADA

(co 1947A allbo 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)
Lee v. GNLV CORP.
996 P.2d 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zone Vs. Fremont St. Experience Llc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zone-vs-fremont-st-experience-llc-nev-2020.